

Ken's books are available on Amazon

WAQY Interview Link January 19, 2011
Recent MFG Interview with Ken Gronbach
Listen to Ken's recent intewrviews with Jim Blasingame!
Hartford Business Journal Interview December 2011
Hartford Business Journal
Q&A with Demographer Ken Gronbach
By Keith Griffin
Q. Last year in an interview with the Hartford Business Journal http://www.hartfordbusiness.com/news15938.html, you said manufacturing is poised to make a comeback in Connecticut, not necessarily in a year or two, but in the future. You still holding to that belief?
Absolutely, there is more and more evidence that manufacturing is making a comeback in Connecticut. For example we have a shortage of skilled labor. You don’t have a shortage of skilled labor if they are not in demand.
Q. You talk about Generation Y becoming entrepreneurs. What does that mean for Connecticut? Is the population going to be in place to handle an uptick in manufacturing jobs?
Generation Y will become entrepreneurs out of necessity, the mother of invention. Generation Y is facing 50% unemployment as they enter the labor market. The ones that don’t get hired still have to eat and they won’t be able to live at home forever. In addition, decent paying manufacturing jobs are going unfilled. How long do you think it will be before Generation Y figures out the paradigm shift and gets the training necessary to land a good paying manufacturing job? Connecticut has an abundance of Generation Y kids. This bodes well for the state.
Q. Your perception of Generation Y differs from the common-held beliefs. 2012 seems like a prime time for Gen Y to break out. What can Connecticut employers expect?
The big story will be the employer’s market. Connecticut employers will have their pick of the best and brightest young workers from the biggest selection in twenty years. The hungry Generation Y kids will bring a new dynamic to the workplace and put pressure on the small entitled Generation X, now 27 to 46 years olds. The message from Generation Y to Generation X is “perform or get out of the way.” Boomers in the workplace will love and identify with the spunky Generation Y workers. Boomers are 47 to 66 years old.
Q. There's an interview with you on your blog where you say, "Generation X did not opt for the technical careers that the Boomers did, like factory work, electricians, plumbers." You predict factory work is coming back. What about the electrical and plumbing trades? Is Generation Y going into them in sufficient numbers?
Vacancies in the technical trades spell opportunity. The trades are dominated by Boomers who are thinking about retirement and leaving the workforce at the rate of about one every eight seconds. You will not be able to hide this opportunity from the huge Generation Y.
Q. That same interview has another interesting observation, " If you want to go experience Italy, you’ve got to go now, because in ten years you won’t be able to experience Italy. France is feeling it big time. The problem is that they forgot to have kids. Remember that people precipitate economics, not the other way around. Without people, you don’t have anything." What part of the world is populating itself correctly?
2.2 kids per couple is a magic number. It is called replacement level fertility. When you fall below this number you risk not having enough heavy lifters (taxpayers) to provide for the young and the elderly in forty to fifty years. The European Union, Eastern Europe and all of Asia are demographic time bombs because they fell below and stayed below replacement level fertility for over thirty years and counting. Africa, India and the Middle East all have their own demographic issues. The United States and most of the Americas are doing it right. Australia is a poster child for healthy demographics.
Q. Let's take more a micro-look. How is Connecticut handling its population growth? How are the Millenials going to do when it comes time to follow Gen Y? What's going right?
Connecticut has a shortage of Generation X. They went away to school and stayed there. Connecticut has an abundance of Generation Y. The average age we marry for the first time in the United States is 26 years old. Generation Y will start to marry with a vengeance and stay here in Connecticut. This will coincide with an improved housing market, a commensurate drop in unemployment and the return of a vibrant state-wide economy.
30 Million Chinese Men With No Prospect of Marrying
CHINA ECONOMY TO CRASH AND BURN
[This guest column is written by Ken Gronbach, a past PEMA® meeting speaker. Mr. Gronbach’s views are presented as his and his only.]
I remember my first PEMA® presentation a year and a half ago in Florida. Someone raised his hand and said “I go to Beijing all the time, looks fine to me.” It was an honest statement. But trust me Beijing is not fine. China cannot recover from what it has done to itself demographically with its “One Child Only Policy”. So what does this mean to PEMA® members? Should you bail from China now? No, make money while you can but don’t make long term capital commitments. Lease, rent and keep both eyes open because the Chinese house of cards is going to crash and burn.
Many facts in this article are chilling, but you need to be aware of them. China’s economy is directly dependent on its demography. China has tampered with its demography to its own detriment.
I just stared at the photo of the idle young Chinese men. It bothered me. I was missing something. How could there be 30 million more Chinese men than women. Sonograms are illegal in China. How did the parents know they were males? The answer is simple. They determined they were males when they were born. And if they were baby girls, well, they were disposed of. The baby girls were not aborted, they were killed as infants. Infanticide. I don't have any place to file this information in my brain and apparantly the rest of the world doesn't either, because no one talks about it. Let's pretend it doesn't happen.
The Chinese approved press was volunteering the fact that there were 30,000,000 young Chinese men of marrying age that could not find wives. The reason given was the pervasive “One Child Only Policy” enforced by the Chinese high command for the last thirty one years. Males were obviously favored by Chinese parents under this rule because they were more likely to care for the parents in their old age according to Chinese tradition. Having a girl baby was bad luck because she was likely to eventually marry and care for her husband’s parents.
China’s social security is family. There is no formal state sponsored financial safety net for the elderly. A typical symbol for a family is a pyramid. At the top you have a couple, and then you have a large number of children. Below them you have an even larger number of grandchildren and finally an even larger number of great grandchildren. Though this triangle may not always be played out in modern culture it has been the corner stone of societies through-out the ages. With their “One Child Only Policy” China has inverted the family pyramid. They call it “Four, Two, One”. Four grandparents are at the top, then two parents and finally one child. The child will have no brothers, sisters, aunts, uncles, nieces or nephews, no family. Being elderly without family in China is going to be very difficult.
The thought of China rising to the position of the dominant economic world power and influencing world-wide public policy is frightening. From my perspective they have no moral compass. I recently heard President Obama expressing the desire to have the United States re-establish itself as if we had fallen in some way and turned the baton over to China. We haven’t and they are not even close. The United States GDP is about $15 trillion. China’s GDP is about $5 trillion. Germany is about $4 trillion and Japan is about $3 trillion. We have a bigger GDP than our nearest three competitors combined. What do we need to re-establish? China produces but cannot consume because their vast 800,000,000 work force is not paid at a level that facilitates consumption. In order for the Chinese GDP to increase the United States would need to consume more. Also it is not likely that China will call in their loans to the United States any time soon because we are their best customer. They need us.
China officially boasts of preventing 400,000,000 live births in the last thirty-one years with its “One Child Only Policy.” In the short term this is an economic accelerant because China has not had to feed, clothe, educate or house the equivalent population of the United States and Mexico combined. In addition this afforded them substantial recognition at the Third International Conference on Climate and Water in Helsinki in 2007 for significantly reducing their carbon footprint. However from an economic perspective they have also significantly reduced their number of potential consumers, wage earners and tax-payers by 400,000,000. The full weight of this population reduction will play out over the next twenty to thirty years. Demographers worldwide believe the results will be economically catastrophic.
China has other problems albeit not as horrific as the “One Child Only Policy”. Their currency must be allowed to fluctuate according to world market and the pressure is on from many quarters including the United States. As it stands now the value of the Yuan is artificially suppressed by the Chinese government. They just keep printing more of it to keep the value down. If you want to see the net results of this just go shop at Wal-Mart. If the Yuan was allowed to fluctuate as other world currencies it would double in value and everything in Wal-Mart would double in price. The Yuan will increase in value. It is just a matter of time. This will be bad news for China and Wal-Mart.
Shipping costs are rising with the cost of oil. China produces lots of stuff but doesn’t consume much because they don’t pay their workers at Western levels. Shipping is critical to them because it is imperative to get their cheap goods to their consumers in the European Union and in the United States. As the price of shipping increases so will the price of their goods. Low price is the single biggest advantage that the Chinese producers have to offer. The Chinese will not go quietly. Watch for them to pull quality out of their products in an effort to preserve margins. Let’s hope they don’t capture too much of our food market before this really sets in or you can be sure they will have no reservations about poisoning us. If you think I am being too harsh in my forecasts, think again. The proof will be in the pudding. Sorry.
By 2016, the huge 800,000,000 Chinese labor force will begin shrinking. Less labor means higher wages. The Chinese are already experiencing labor shortages in isolated areas. When you compete for labor the employer’s market disappears and the employee’s market emerges. This should be fun to watch. China is very used to abusing their labor. Workers have been expendable for decades. That’s over. Labor costs should spike and tensions will increase. The price for Chinese made goods will increase and their desirability will decrease. The paper tiger will begin to unravel.
China has polluted its water in its rush to economic prominence. So China has an acute shortage of potable water and an acute shortage of women. Russia has both. Russia should be concerned.
The United States has 5 percent of the world’s population but we produce 25 percent of the world’s economy. We are the best place on earth and our best days are ahead not behind us! The best and brightest people from all over the world are going to pour into our country because the rest of the world, the European Union, Eastern Europe, the Middle East, Sub-Sahara Africa and all of Asia are going to be difficult places to live and because they want to be part of the success of the Americas.
Count on it!
Demography is Destiny
Demography Is Destiny
BNH spoke to Ken Gronbach, author of The Age Curve: How To Profit from the Coming Demographic Storm (AMACOM, 2008) and Common Census: The Counter-Intuitive Guide to Generational Marketing (Ford Odell Group, 2005). Gronbach, who ran an ad shop, KGA Advertising, in Middletown for years, sees in demographic trends reasons to espouse what most would describe as a contrarian view on America’s and China’s economic futures. Gronbach says demographics are destiny and marketers and public decision makers disregard them at their peril. BNH Publisher Mitchell Young interviewed Gronbach.
You had an agency for a long time in Connecticut. How did you transition into demographics guru?
My wife and I opened our own agency in 1979, and one of our signature clients was American Honda Motorcycle. We had all the dealers from the tip of Maine out to Pittsburgh down to Washington, D.C. — about 140 dealers. We were selling motorcycles like crazy, but [suddenly] in 1986, the bikes were shipped to the dealers. They put them on the floor, and no one came in.
Between 1986 and 1992, we tried everything, Honda put their full force behind it to solve the problem, but by 1992, business fell 80 percent and they closed all the dealers.
Was it the economy?
it wasn’t the economy; it was a demographic phenomenon. [Born] between 1965 and 1984, Generation X had nine million fewer people than the baby boomers. From a marketing standpoint, if you dropped the size of your market by over ten percent, you’ve essentially atomized it. We knew we sold motorcycles to men 16 to 24 years old and when the baby boomers exited that age, motorcycle business dropped like a stone. That’s what tipped me off to so many other issues in our marketplace. Generation X closed 30 percent of the public schools; Generation X shut down the motorcycle industry. It didn’t threaten the colleges, ironically, because they [Gen X] went to college at a much higher rate than the baby boomers.
Now Generation X age is into the car-buying age. The best customer for a Detroit automobile is a 43-year-old. That’s when the most miles are put on the car — ferrying the kids around, trips and all that jazz. The baby boomers move on, Generation X moves into the age when they’re expected to buy cars from Detroit at the level of the baby boomers, and Detroit starts firing their ad agencies and firing their presidents because sales are going down. They said, ‘We’re not getting our message out — our SUV sales are way down.’ Well, SUV sales wiped out because the buyers are wiped out. Nobody counted them.
The bottom line was that there were just fewer people to take the boomers’ place?
The most important thing was that we sent our production overseas, primarily to China. The reason for that was during the last 20 years it was an employees market: for every ten jobs being exited by the baby boomers, there were only eight [Generation X] applicants. McDonalds couldn’t even find people.
What is the birth-year range of the baby boom?
The baby boomers were born from 1945 to 1964. The next would be Generation X, and they were born between 1965 and 1984. The peak years for the boomers were between 1957 and 1961; it is a huge bell-shaped curve. Then you have Generation X, but it’s an inverted bell curve. Their lowest birth-rate years were between ’71 and ’74.
So Generation X made an employment shift from the baby boomers?
Generation X did not opt for the technical careers that the Boomers did, like factory work, electricians, plumbers. [Those occupations are] saturated with baby boomers, and boomers went into business for themselves because they couldn’t find work. That’s exactly what we’re facing right now: The kids currently between seven to 26 years old, Generation Y, are facing 50-percent unemployment. My kids can’t find summer jobs, you have to do something else — go into business for yourself. The jobs Generation Y are beginning to fill are jobs exited by Generation X. And X is a small footprint. Companies have achieved efficiencies, they’ve automated, entry-level doesn’t need as many people, a lot of things are bought online, there just aren’t as many opportunities for kids getting out of high school and college.
These demographic numbers are not secrets. So what are major companies or government agencies doing about it?
In 1998, Aetna wanted to buy US Healthcare and a friend on the board wanted me to share my opinion. I said it would be a demographic disaster. The generation that was paying into health-care insurance and using more than they were paying was the generation called the Silent Generation, born 1925 to 1944. They were tiny — their numbers are down around 50 million. The baby boomers’ numbers are up around 80 million. I told them, the Silents are going away, they’re going on Medicare. What’s next is baby boomers are moving into the age where they’re going to be paying into the system and using more [health care] than they’re paying for. You’re expecting the next generation [Gen X] that’s 11 percent smaller to pick up the slack. I couldn’t convince Aetna that this was an obvious demographic disaster. They did it anyway, and then lost $10 billion.
You said that to fix the jobs problem you have to fix the housing market. Why?
What we learned from 2008 was that the housing market is the economy. Seventy-five percent of the housing market in Arizona is foreclosures, which means there is no market. I would tell our legislators, senators and congressmen to enforce President Obama’s Home Affordable Mediation Program [HAMP]. They were supposed to sit down with the homeowners and figure out how to keep people in their homes. Take the foreclosures off the market, and you have shrunk your market in some cases by 60 percent. If you shrink the housing market in Connecticut by 60 percent, the market would come back, home values would go through the roof, it would be a signal to buy, and everybody would be back to work.
There are major assumptions about the growth of China, but you have different viewpoints of China’s future demographics.
Demographers worldwide know what’s going to happen in China. The number of people they prevented from being born through their one-child-only policy was 400 million people. To take 400 million people out of the last 32 years of the population is to literally reduce fertility by 75 percent. They went from 40 million babies per year to approaching ten million per year.
But they have a lot of people, so why would that be a bad thing?
Because you can’t cut a hole in your population. The part of the population that does the heavy lifting are the ones between 40 and 60 years old. So when it becomes the turn of this tiny group of under-30-year-olds to do the heavy lifting, they simply don’t have enough people. Economists have begun writing about their mysterious labor shortage. If you literally cut your fertility rate by 75 percent, you should expect a labor shortage.
They’ve set the stage for their country to go into economic chaos and there’s no reversing it. They simply will not have enough people to produce enough to care for their elderly. Imagine that you’re 70 years old and lost your usefulness as a laborer. You’ve worked 40 years for zip, so you don’t have much saved up, and now the country doesn’t have enough taxpayers to support you. But China never had that system anyway. Their Social Security was called ‘family’ — and they obliterated it.
Aren’t the elderly in China a more or less protected class?
They’re protected culturally by the family, but it has nothing to do with the government. They went from two grandparents with eight children and 32 grandchildren. That was the system that supported the elderly. Now it’s four grandparents, two parents and one child. They don’t even know what the word ‘cousin’ means.
To throw another wrench in the works, [demographer] Nicolas Eberstadt believes the single biggest problem China is going to have is their management model to run the companies. Their model to date has been family, because they don’t trust anyone. There’s no president, two vice presidents and a chain of command; it’s family. And without family running the businesses, the businesses won’t run.
Is there a similar problem in India? They have 1.1 billion people.
Nobody knows how many people are in India; it could well be in excess of China right now. No one knows. The CIA Factbook can guess, but there’s no way to count those people. It could be as much as 750 million in northern India alone. It’s abject poverty and no education whatsoever up there, and probably 20 to 30 years behind China. The southern part of India is where the wealthy people are and they’re doing exactly what the Chinese are doing. So their problems are very similar. Is India in better shape than China? Yeah, in the long term. One, they’re our friend, and China is not. The real problem is their proximity to China.
But aren’t more prosperous Indian families having more children?
We see that wherever the Western culture goes, when people become prosperous they have fewer kids because they enjoy their wealth. They’re more selfish. Here is the big picture: If you live in Spain, France, Portugal or Germany right now, you have come to the conclusion that you’ve made a mistake by not having kids. Because the Muslims are overwhelming you. They’re having ten kids and you’re having none. Only one in seven German couples get married, and they don’t have kids. The E.U. [European Union] is done. If you want to go experience Italy, you’ve got to go now, because in ten years you won’t be able to experience Italy. France is feeling it big time. The problem is that they forgot to have kids. Remember that people precipitate economics, not the other way around. Without people, you don’t have anything.
Ten years is a pretty short time period.
It’s going to happen in our lifetime. When things go south, they go very fast. Look at 2008 — we almost lost the world economy. Once the façade of China is realized you’re going to see [that] as fast as China advanced, it’s going to decelerate.
So the high unemployment rate among Generation Y in the U.S. is because of their large numbers.
Yes. We’re the only industrialized nation in Western culture that had kids. And Generation Y is bigger than the boomer generation. The magic number is about 2.2 — you have to have more than two [children on average to grow population].
If China is going to have a labor shortage, won’t that be good for the American Generation Y?
It’s perfect. Manufacturing will start coming back to the States, and it’s going to come back with a vengeance. Colleges are reporting that their populations are 60-40 women. So where are the men? They don’t need to go to college. The boomers dominated the technical trades. And as they retire, the Generation Y men have picked up on it. Here’s an example: you have twins — a boy and a girl. The boy wants to be an auto mechanic, and the girl wants to be an attorney. She goes through four years of high school, then to a good four-year college. At 22 she goes through another three years of school to become an attorney. Now she’s 25, and has $300,000 in student loans. She gets her first job and makes $60,000, not a bad start.
Her brother goes through four years at a technical school. He gets out at 18 and goes to a Mercedes dealership and is an apprentice for two years. He buys his own tools over that time, and then at 20 years old they offer him a full-time job and pay him $100,000. At this point his sister is still in her third year of college, and at 25 he’s already made half a million dollars, while she’s in debt $300,000.
You asked about my advice for our governor: Spend some money on our technical schools, because that’s where the big dividends will be.
In Connecticut we believe that college is where the dividends are.
So what you’ll have is a bunch of highly educated people that have no jobs.
Many complain about the inability of the young kids to get down and work. Why?
You haven’t felt the effect of Generation Y yet. Their peak birth rate was around 1990, so they’re only 21 years old. You’re not going to feel them for another three to five years.
What will they be like in the workplace?
You’re going to hire the best people you ever hired, the smartest people you ever hired, and you’re going to have the best choice of people you ever had. You’ll run an ad and people are going to wrap around your building. They’re going to come in, and they’re going to understand that hard work is a condition of employment. They’re not going to call in ‘tired.’ Believe me, Generation Y is going to be the most productive generation in our history. A tremendous influx of people will pour into our labor system. And that’s good for insurance, because they’ll be paying in and not using it.
But because they’re young and healthy, won’t they not buy insurance?
They’ll buy insurance because they’re going to get married younger. And that’s because you’ll have a whole crop of young men that are going to be making a livable wage at 21 instead of 27.
What do people need to know that they don’t know now — what do we need to fix?
There’s a shortage of dads. Half the babies born in the U.S. today don’t have dads. According to Eberstadt, who has roots in secular demography, the strength of the U.S. is faith and family, and he’s not saying that as an evangelist. We need to make sure our kids understand that it’s important to get married and it’s important to keep your word and it’s important to be responsible, and it’s important to have children. There was a 20-year interval where we didn’t have [enough] babies. Not having them between 1965 and 1984 is what created the problem for consumption and labor.
Well, today Americans are reacting to immigration in part because of the job market.
Immigration is our strength. The immigrants who came in filled in the hole in Generation X. Latinos poured into the country because that’s where the opportunity was. Let’s say Latinos assimilate in 20 years; their kids won’t even speak Spanish. The stats of the number of Latinos in the military is overwhelming. If they’ll fight for the country, they want to be Americans. In 2025, we will begin a new generation called the ‘Baby Blenders.’ Our kids will intermarry because they don’t see color or race any more. We’ll look like Derek Jeter.Generation Y is Why.
I had an experience in a supermarket checkout line recently that sent a chill up my spine. It wasn’t the cost of food although that was staggering enough. It was a comment by the young woman who was checking me through the line at light speed. I estimated that she was in her late teens, born in the mid nineties, a perfect Generation Y example. She looked at my wrist watch and said “you don’t see many of those anymore.” I thought this was a really cool comment because it is rare that anyone recognizes the fact that I wear an antique Rolex. I thought to myself that this young woman was surprisingly savvy. I told her that it was a 1974 Stainless Rolex Precision that actually needed to be wound. Her response was a blank stare, not what I expected. I knew there was a communication disconnect. Then she said: “Most people don’t wear watches anymore.” It was my turn for the blank stare and then the chill. Watches are out dated. I am old.
I have two Generation Y daughters, one sixteen and one nineteen. When I got home with the food I relayed my experience in the checkout line. Their expressions essentially said, “Where have you been?” My oldest said, “Haven’t you noticed that we don’t wear watches?” I guess I hadn’t. My youngest then dropped the real bomb, “Dad, you wear an analog watch. I have friends that cannot tell time that way.” Was she kidding? No, she was not kidding. Is this what Bob Dylan meant by the lyrics “The Times They are a Changin…” I need to lie down, maybe get counseling.
My first fear was that what I was experiencing was early onset Alzheimer’s, a truly chilling fear. Clearly it was not. The times were changing, profoundly changing. Who would have thought that people, younger generations, would begin to view time differently? Seriously, time. What else do they view differently? Nothing is sacred or off limits. What else have we taken for granted? Food? Marriage? Families? Cars? Education? Friendship? Clothing? Entertainment? Jobs? Vacations? Life from the new perspective had to be reviewed and taken into account or you would be left behind. I refuse to be left behind.
My daughters are willing to help me understand Generation Y; after all it is in their best interests. So let’s examine a small cross section of how thinking is changing and what’s in store for us. For the record Generation Y was born 1985 to 2004. There are about eighty-two million of them, three million more than the Baby Boomers. They are voracious consumers who have not come close to hitting their consumption stride. That comes later when they earn their own money. We are the only contemporary Western civilization and the only industrialized nation that has a substantial Generation Y. They will be the biggest and best labor force our Nation has ever enjoyed. As they seek entry level jobs they face unemployment as high as fifty percent. The paradigm has shifted from an employees’ market of the last twenty years to and employers’ market. The best and brightest will get jobs and the rest will open their own businesses out of necessity just like the Boomers did in the seventies.
For the last thirty years the European Union, Eastern Europe and all of Asia have reduced their fertility to below replacement level decimating their future labor forces and guaranteeing that manufacturing will once again flourish in the United States. (Babies become adults. What were they thinking?) The future is very bright for the United States and Generation Y is why.
Generation Y does not see color, race, ethnic origin or religion as a barrier to relationships. It is not because they are tolerant, it’s because it never enters their minds. The concept of racial bigotry is an oddity and a curiosity to them. They will fall in love and marry without prejudice. The average skin tone in the United States thirty years from now will be decidedly darker. Red heads will be extremely rare and very valuable.
Generation Y is turned off by their parent’s 6,000 square foot starter castes. My daughters tell me that if I wanted to see the future Generation Y living quarters just go to IKEA. Research shows that Generation Y will favor 1,500 square foot homes that are self sustaining with cement walls, plastic window casings, tile roofs and geo-thermal heating and cooling. My daughters will of course condescend to stay in our starter caste until they can afford their smaller greener homes. Some things never change.
My daughters have never fully understood where the meat in a McDonald’s Big Mac comes from or have even come to grips with the fact that it is meat… from an animal… that had to die. This is the original “Don’t ask, don’t tell.”
Are super markets in for a wake up call? Big time. Say goodbye to meat counters. Say hello to prepared foods. My wife cooks, very well. We sit at a table and eat breakfast, lunch and dinner as a family. My daughters remind us that we are an anomaly, an anachronism. “We’re the only family that does this, you know.” What does the word dinner mean to Generation Y? I have been in homes where Mom announces dinner and the family comes from all over the house to get a plate of food and then return to where they came from. This is dinner?
Will Generation Y change our labor force? I think yes. I was working on a story on my antique laptop when suddenly my document went into hieroglyphic mode. It became a jumble of foreign looking symbols. When I checked all my other documents the same was true for them. Sweat began to pour off my face because I have saved nothing. My life was over. Just then my oldest daughter walked behind my chair texting on her phone and listening to her iPod. She saw my problem reached over my shoulder and with a couple of key strokes solved the issue totally. She then sat down at her desktop and pulled up Facebook and then someone in Skype. Then she turned on the TV. I just stared at her and said, “Work for me.” Boomers are immigrants in the cyber world and speak with a thick accent. Generation X is bi-lingual. Generation Y speaks cyber naturally as a first language. They will bring a dimension of efficiency to the labor force that we have never seen before, ever.
The movie "Fast and Furious 2009" broke box office records. No surprise there. I forecast this in 2003 in my book "Common Census" when the leading edge of Generation Y was just starting to drive. I covered the subject in detail in my 2008 book "Age Curve". I stated that Detroit had missed an obvious cue spelled out in the overwhelming popularity of "Fast and Furious 2001". The huge new market for cars, Generation Y, is not going to buy the latest mutation of the SUV. What are they going to buy? Small light weight rocket fast Asian cars. Watch both movies. The continuity is on the money. I know because I spent the better part of the Summer of 2007 filming Generation Y hot-rodders. Japanese automobile sales are going to continue to spike. If Detroit can get their act together and build what Generation Y wants they could have powered out of this crisis without a crippling bailout.
There is more, a lot more. Really more than I can cover here. Generation Y is about to overwhelm the US highways driving the fastest cars ever made. The AAA tells us that the chance of dying in an accident in a small car are twice that of an SUV. In addition, as the Baby Boomer Harley riders begin to fade into oblivion, there will be a sea of male Generation Y Sport Bike enthusiasts trying to kill themselves on machines capable of 200 mph (not a typo). In short we have a huge young high accident risk population/generation headed right at us and no is talking about it. Public Safety/police need to start preparing now because believe me they are not going to catch these kids with their anachronistic Ford Crown Victorias or existing technology. Hospitals, trauma centers and emergency workers are going to get caught flat footed by a dramatic increase in traffic accident victims. People needing organ transplants will see a surge in availability. Car insurance rates that have been stable for the last twenty years because of the small number of young drivers (Generation X) could double and triple. The United States healthcare crisis is about to be sucker punched. Auto body shops franchises like Maaco and parts stores like Pep Boys should see a surge in business.
I speak all over the United States to a broad spectrum of audiences about shifting demography, everyone from associations of funeral directors to manufacturers to financial institutions. I warn them about the perils of misunderstanding Generation Y. I tell banks to get Generation Y representation on their boards of directors or they risk having their industry become a buggy whip. Generation Y banks on their iPhones. Generation Y will make the arrangements when their Boomer parents die. What will they do? Don’t count on anything traditional.
The mandate is clear. We need to embrace Generation Y and really understand how they think now because clearly, right on their heels, is Generation Z, born 2005 to 2024 and they are a whole new ball game.
Remember, it’s a fact. We age. You can’t speed it up and you can’t slow it down. But that doesn’t mean you let life pass you by.
Shifting Demography and the Senior Living Market Plays Out
Page 2 Senior Living Business May 2011
By Jane Zarem, Editor
Best Practices Q&A:
Kenneth W. Gronbach, Principal
KGC Direct, LLC
Ken Gronbach, Principal at KGC Direct, LLC
Haddam, Connecticut, and author of "The Age Curve"
is a demographer, futurist, and generational marketer.
A nationally recognized expert who regularly counsels
businesses across the country on marketing and societal
phenomena, his ability to accurately forecast which markets
are growing and which are slowing has made him a fixture
on the speaker circuit. We talked with him specifically about
the shifting demographics of the senior care market and
what those demographics portend for providers.
• How would you describe the shifting demographics
of the senior care market?
According to the The United States Census Bureau's National Center for
Health Statistics, the number of births for the GI Generation
(born 1905-25) was 56.6 million; Silent Generation, 52.5
million (born 1925-1945); Baby Boomers, 78.2 million
(born 1945-65); Generation X, 69.5 million (born 1965-85);
and Generation Y, 91 million (born 1985-2004).
As those figures indicate, the GI Generation was
huge—more than 70 million when you add nearly 20
million European immigrants into that age group. Then
came the Silent Generation. Fertility dropped like a stone
due to The Depression and World War II, and immigration
became a negative figure. In terms of population, the
Silent Generation is the smallest generation of the last 100
years—and, unfortunately, it is also the market for senior
living for the next 15 years.
• Why, then, do we hear so much about the “graying
of America”?
The graying of America is a myth—at least until the first
Baby Boomers start entering senior care facilities. That
won’t happen for 15-20 years, with the peak occurring in
about 30 years. Until then, who will populate senior care
facilities? That is a major challenge for providers.
From my perspective, the existing business model—
with its core customer being an 82-year-old woman who will reside in
the facility for four or five years—will not work when half
the market disappears. The industry will have to redefine
itself, repurpose buildings, or consolidate. Some facilities
will likely shut down. At the very least, they will have to
bring in a different type of customer to survive within the
existing infrastructure.
• Who are those new customers?
A new market might be younger individuals needing short-term rehabilitative care. For example, Baby Boomers (currently 47-66 years old) are a disproportionately obese generation with attendant health problems. In the near term, they are a likely source of short-term care or rehabilitation patients. Another possibility is the “Over-55 Residential Living” market, which is one of the hottest markets right now. It’s huge. Developers in the South can’t build these communities fast enough, and they’re most popular as rental units. So if senior living communities can figure out how to plug into that market—invite in younger, healthier people who just want to plan for the rest of their lives and put home ownership behind them—they could attract Baby Boomers who will absolutely need graduated services eventually. Initially, though, Baby Boomers are mainly interested in three things: Help me save time, make my life easy, and don’t rip me off. That’s really all they ask. • What’s in store for providers regarding the labor force? That’s the good news. Generation Y (born 1985-2004), the largest generation in the history of our nation, has completely changed the employment paradigm. They’re just beginning to enter the labor force and, in many categories, are facing up to 50% unemployment. The “employee’s market” of the last 20 years, characterized by a shortage of entry-level and quality labor, is finished. The huge mass of Gen Y people that are currently begging for jobs will be good employees. They will show up on time and work hard, because that will be a condition of employment. So labor—skilled, managerial, and younger entry-level workers—will not be an issue going forward. Senior living providers will have all the workers they need...guaranteed. • Any other good news? China is in big trouble, which is good news for American manufacturers. As an industrialized powerhouse, China has peaked, primarily because of its one-child policy—the biggest demographic blunder in the history of the world. The one-child policy was precipitated, ironically, by Henry Kissinger, who warned China that the West wouldn’t take it seriously unless it got control of its population growth. As a result, the country today has an insufficient source of labor under age 30. Back in the 1970s, China produced 40 million babies a year; today, the fertility rate is down to 10 million babies per year. Over 40 years, China eliminated a population equivalent to that of the United States and Mexico. You can’t cut the fertility rate by 75% without creating a hole in the population. Young people do the heavy lifting when it comes to caring for the nation, and China just doesn’t have the critical mass of workers it will need going forward. Therefore, manufacturing in the United States will begin to prosper dramatically. The industry will see jobs return from China for a variety reasons, including shipping and quality issues. More importantly, China will have to pay more for labor as a result of eliminating much of its workforce, so pricing for Chinese-made goods will have to increase. That will eliminate any advantage U.S. companies have gained by manufacturing in China. So economically speaking, our best days lie ahead. • How will that affect senior living? In a bad economy, it’s difficult to sell homes. And people certainly don’t want to sell their homes below value. Once our economy improves sufficiently, the housing market should also recover. At that point, why would elderly people want to burden themselves with, say, a two-level home that’s difficult to maintain? With an attractive senior living community as a viable alternative, they would move in a heartbeat. Mom and Dad want their independence; but if that involves worrying about the plumbing, they really don’t need that grief.







